The Contestation Of Religion And Science In The Perspective Of Conspiracy Theory: The Though Of Karl Popper And Ibn Rushd
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study explores the intersection between religion and science through the lens of conspiracy theory, specifically by examining the thoughts of Karl Popper and Ibn Rushd. Employing a qualitative method through literature review and philosophical-historical analysis, the research delves into the epistemological frameworks of both thinkers. The findings reveal that Karl Popper criticizes conspiracy theories as pseudoscience lacking falsifiability, while Ibn Rushd promotes the reconciliation of reason and revelation as a path to harmonize science and religion. This article identifies that external factors—such as political interests, cultural narratives, and media influence—often catalyze the conflict rather than inherent contradictions between religion and science. The novelty of this research lies in its interdisciplinary approach combining Western and Islamic philosophical perspectives to address contemporary sociocultural challenges. The study suggests that rational education and philosophical dialogue should be prioritized in shaping policies that aim to reduce societal polarization and promote constructive engagement between religious and scientific communities.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Rincian Artikel
Bagian

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Cara Mengutip
Referensi
Abdullah, M. A. (2020). Mendialogkan Nalar Agama Dan Sains Modern di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Dalam Maarif. Academia.Edu. Https://Doi.Org/10.47651/Mrf.V15i1.75
Alam, D. (2021). Kaitan Teori-Teori Konspirasi Dengan Penyebaran Hoaks Dan Pemidanaan Bagi Pembuat Dan Penyebarnya. Dalam Supremasi Hukum. Academia.Edu. Https://Doi.Org/10.33592/Jsh.V17i2.1299
Alkaf, M. (2020). Agama, Sains, Dan Covid-19: Perspektif Sosial-Agama. Dalam Maarif. S3pi.Umy.Ac.Id. Https://Doi.Org/10.47651/Mrf.V15i1.79
Amrullah, K. (2022). Hubungan Agama Dan Sains: Telaah Kritis Sejarah Filsafat Sains Islam Dan Modern. Intizar. Http://Repo.Unida.Gontor.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/3218
Andersen, C. A. (2022). Falsafa. Ibn Rushd, Filosofien Og Islam. Philpapers.Org. Https://Philpapers.Org/Rec/ANDFIR-2
Aviña Gutiérrez, J. (2023). Caminos De La Verdad. Karl Popper. RDP Revista Digital De Posgrado, 8, 29–33. Https://Doi.Org/10.22201/Fesa.Rdp.2024.8.67
Azhar, A. (2017). Sains Islam Vs Sains Barat: Analisis Amalan Dan Perbandingan:[Islamic Science Vs Western Science: Practices And Comparative Analysis]. Ulum Islamiyyah. Https://Doi.Org/10.33102/Uij.Vol21no0.21
Bofa, M., Wawan Budi, D., & Sudirman, A. (2022). Data Rights Di Era Surveillance Capitalism: Skandal Data Cambridge Analytica & Facebook Dalam Pemilihan Presiden Amerika Serikat 2016. Hasanuddin Journal of International Affairs, 2(2), 144–159. Https://Doi.Org/10.31947/Hjirs.V2i2.22686
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Pops.12568
Faizin, F. (2017). Integrasi Agama Dan Sains Dalam Tafsir Ilmi Kementerian Agama RI. Jurnal Ushuluddin. Https://Doi.Org/10.24014/Jush.V25i1.2560
Gunawan, J. Y. (2023, Juni 16). Bagaimana Ibnu Rusyd Memikirkan Internet Dan Pajak? Direktoreat Jendral Pajak. Https://Www.Pajak.Go.Id/Index.Php/Id/Artikel/Bagaimana-Ibnu-Rusyd-Memikirkan-Internet-Dan-Pajak
Komarudin, K. (2014). Falsifikasi Karl Popper Dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya Dalam Keilmuan Islam. At-Taqaddum. Https://Journal.Walisongo.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Attaqaddum/Article/View/720
Lubis, N. (2021). Agama Dan Media: Teori Konspirasi Covid-19. Dalam Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner. Academia.Edu. Https://Doi.Org/10.14421/Jkii.V4i1.1188
Muhadjir, H. N. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Pendekatan Positivistik, Rasionalistik, Phenomenologik, Dan Realisme Metaphistik, Telaah Studi Teks Dan Penelitian Agama. Rake Sarasin. Https://Books.Google.Co.Id/Books?Id=3oxwaaaacaaj
Popper, K., & Gombrich, E. H. (2013). The Open Society And Its Enemies: New One-Volume Edition. Princeton University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.2307/J.Ctt24hqxs
Popper, K. R. (2019). The Conspiracy Theory Of Society. Conspiracy Theories. Https://Doi.Org/10.4324/9781315259574-2
Pratiwi, A. I., & Vera, N. (2023). The Myth Of Maghrib Prohibition In “Sandekala” Film: Reception Analysis Toward Indonesian Audiences. International Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis, 06(06). Https://Doi.Org/10.47191/Ijmra/V6-I6-69
Robertson, D. G. (2015). Conspiracy Theories And The Study Of Alternative And Emergent Religions. Nova Religio, 19(2), 5–16. Https://Doi.Org/10.1525/Nr.2015.19.2.5
Shines, F., & Shines, G. (2020). Let In But Left Out: Leadership, Faith And Knowledge In The Age Of AI, Coronavirus And Fake News. Frank Shines.
Syifani, F., & Saputra, A. (2024). Eksplorasi Teologis Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Prespektif Agama Dan Sains. Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan. Https://Jurnal.Ittc.Web.Id/Index.Php/Jkis/Article/View/1400
Yamani, G. (2020). Ibn Rusyd (Kritik Terhadap Al-Gazali Dan Pengaruhnya Di Eropa). Dalam Moderasi: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Moderasi.Org. Https://Moderasi.Org/Index.Php/Moderasi/Article/Download/31/25